Product Code Database
Example Keywords: produce -scarf $45-161
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Japonic Languages
Tag Wiki 'Japonic Languages'.
Tag

Japonic or Japanese–Ryukyuan () is a comprising Japanese, spoken in the main islands of Japan, and the Ryukyuan languages, spoken in the . The family is universally accepted by , and significant progress has been made in reconstructing the , . The reconstruction implies a split between all dialects of Japanese and all Ryukyuan varieties, probably before the 7th century. The Hachijō language, spoken on the , is also included, but its position within the family is unclear.

Most scholars believe that Japonic was brought to the Japanese archipelago from the with the during the 1st millennium BC. There is some fragmentary evidence suggesting that Japonic languages may still have been spoken in central and southern parts of the Korean peninsula (see Peninsular Japonic) in the early centuries AD.

Possible genetic relationships with many other language families have been proposed, most systematically with Koreanic, but no genetic relationship has been conclusively demonstrated.


Classification
The extant Japonic languages belong to two well-defined branches: Japanese and Ryukyuan. Most scholars believe that Japonic was brought to northern from the around 700 to 300 BC by wet-rice farmers of the and spread throughout the Japanese archipelago, replacing indigenous languages. The former wider distribution of is confirmed by placenames in northern ending in (from Ainu 'river') and (from Ainu 'stream'). Somewhat later, Japonic languages also spread southward to the . There is fragmentary placename evidence that now-extinct Japonic languages were still spoken in central and southern parts of the Korean peninsula several centuries later.


Japanese
Japanese is the de facto national language of , where it is spoken by about 126 million people. The oldest attestation is , which was recorded using Chinese characters in the 7th and 8th centuries. It differed from Modern Japanese in having a simple (C)V syllable structure and avoiding vowel sequences. The script also distinguished eight vowels (or diphthongs), with two each corresponding to modern i, e and o. Most of the texts reflect the speech of the area around Nara, the eighth-century Japanese capital, but over 300 poems were written in eastern dialects of Old Japanese.

The language experienced a massive influx of Sino-Japanese vocabulary after the introduction of in the 6th century and peaking with the wholesale importation of Chinese culture in the 8th and the 9th centuries. The loanwords now account for about half the lexicon. They also affected the sound system of the language by adding compound vowels, syllable-final nasals, and geminate consonants, which became separate morae. Most of the changes in morphology and syntax reflected in the modern language took place during the Late Middle Japanese period (13th to 16th centuries).

Modern mainland Japanese dialects, spoken on , , , and , are generally grouped as follows:

  • Eastern Japanese, including most dialects from east, including the modern standard Tokyo dialect.
  • Western Japanese, including most dialects west of Nagoya, including the Kyoto dialect.
  • Kyushu dialects, spoken on the island of Kyushu, including the Kagoshima dialect/Satsugū dialect, spoken in Kagoshima Prefecture in southern Kyushu.

The early capitals of Nara and lay within the western area, and their retained its prestige and influence long after the capital was moved to (modern Tokyo) in 1603. Indeed, the Tokyo dialect has several western features not found in other eastern dialects.

Post-war geolinguistic studies have identified bundles of , often coinciding with geographic features.

  • A large bundle, running north–south through the , forms the basis of the traditional East–West dialect division.
  • Another set of isoglosses separates peripheral areas, mainly northern and western but also and the southern part of the , from the central area. Numerous innovations have spread through the central area, with the peripheral areas preserving older forms. Researchers have found it more difficult to explain other isoglosses in which peripheral areas share mergers of pitch accent classes and reduction of vowel sequences that are preserved in the central area, particularly the .
  • Several isoglosses run roughly east–west, from Fukushima to the western end of , and corresponding to the 0 °C isotherm and 1000 mm .

The Hachijō language, spoken on Hachijō-jima and the Daitō Islands, including Aogashima, is highly divergent and varied. It has a mix of conservative features inherited from Eastern Old Japanese and influences from modern Japanese, making it difficult to classify. Hachijō is an endangered language, with a small population of elderly speakers.


Ryukyuan
The Ryukyuan languages were originally and traditionally spoken throughout the , an stretching between the southern Japanese island of Kyushu and the island of Taiwan. Most of them are considered "definitely" or "critically endangered" because of the spread of mainland Japanese.

Since Old Japanese displayed several innovations that are not shared with Ryukyuan, the two branches must have separated before the 7th century. The move from Kyushu to the Ryukyus may have occurred later and possibly coincided with the rapid expansion of the agricultural in the 10th and 11th centuries. Such a date would explain the presence in Proto-Ryukyuan of Sino-Japanese vocabulary borrowed from Early Middle Japanese. After the migration to the Ryukyus, there was limited influence from mainland Japan until the conquest of the by the in 1609.

Ryukyuan varieties are considered dialects of Japanese in Japan but have little intelligibility with Japanese or even among one another. They are divided into northern and southern groups, corresponding to the physical division of the chain by the 250 km-wide .

Northern Ryukyuan languages are spoken in the northern part of the chain, including the major and . They form a single dialect continuum, with mutual unintelligibility between widely separated varieties. The major varieties are, from northeast to southwest:

  • , on the island of .
  • Northern Amami Ōshima, spoken in most of Amami Ōshima
  • Southern Amami Ōshima, spoken in Setouchi on the southern end of Amami Ōshima.
  • Tokunoshima, on the island of .
  • Okinoerabu, on the island of
  • , on the island of .
  • Kunigami or Northern Okinawan, spoken in the northern part of , including the cities of and .
  • (Central) Okinawan, spoken in the central and southern parts of Okinawa Island, and neighboring islands. The prestige dialect is spoken in , and the former city of Shuri. The Shuri dialect was the lingua franca of the Ryukyuan Kingdom, and was first recorded in the 16th century, particularly in the Omoro Sōshi anthology.

There is no agreement on the subgrouping of the varieties. One proposal, adopted by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, has three subgroups, with the central "Kunigami" branch comprising varieties from Southern Amami to Northern Okinawan, based on similar vowel systems and patterns of lenition of stops. Pellard suggests a binary division based on shared innovations, with an Amami group including the varieties from Kikai to Yoron, and an Okinawa group comprising the varieties of Okinawa and smaller islands to its west.

Southern Ryukyuan languages are spoken in the southern part of the chain, the Sakishima Islands. They comprise three distinct dialect continua:

The southern Ryukyus were settled by Japonic-speakers from the northern Ryukyus in the 13th century, leaving no linguistic trace of the indigenous inhabitants of the islands.


Alternative classifications
An alternative classification, based mainly on the development of the , groups the highly divergent Kagoshima dialects of southwestern Kyushu with Ryukyuan in a Southwestern branch. Kyushu and Ryukyuan varieties also share some lexical items, some of which appear to be innovations. The internal classification by Elisabeth de Boer includes Ryukyuan as a deep subbranch of a Kyūshū–Ryūkyū branch:

  • Japonic
    • Eastern
    • Central
    • Izumo–Tōhoku
    • Kyūshū–Ryūkyū

She also proposes a branch consisting of the (spoken on the northern coast of western Honshu) and the Tōhoku dialects (northern Honshu), which show similar developments in the pitch accent that she attributes to sea-borne contacts.


Peninsular Japonic
There is fragmentary evidence suggesting that now-extinct Japonic languages were spoken in the central and southern parts of the Korean peninsula. Vovin calls these languages Peninsular Japonic and groups Japanese and Ryukyuan as Insular Japonic.

The most-cited evidence comes from chapter 37 of the (compiled in 1145), which contains a list of pronunciations and meanings of placenames in the former kingdom of . As the pronunciations are given using Chinese characters, they are difficult to interpret, but several of those from central Korea, in the area south of the Han River captured from in the 5th century, seem to correspond to Japonic words. Scholars differ on whether they represent the language of Goguryeo or the people that it conquered.

Traces from the south of the peninsula are very sparse:

  • The placenames listed in Chapter 34 of the are not glossed, but many of them can be explained as Japonic words.
  • proposes Japonic etymologies for two of four Baekje words given in the Book of Liang (635).
  • A single word is explicitly attributed to the language of the southern , in Chapter 44 of the . It is a word for 'gate' and appears to have a similar form to the word , with the same meaning.
  • Vovin suggests that the ancient name for the kingdom of on , tammura, may have a Japonic etymology tani mura 'valley settlement' or tami mura 'people's settlement'. He also proposes Japonic etymologies for two other local words.


Proposed external relationships
According to Shirō Hattori, more attempts have been made to link Japanese with other language families than for any other language. None of the attempts has succeeded in demonstrating a common descent for Japonic and any other language family.

The most systematic comparisons have involved , which has a very similar grammatical structure to Japonic languages. Samuel Elmo Martin, John Whitman, and others have proposed hundreds of possible cognates, with sound correspondences. However, points out that Old Japanese contains several pairs of words of similar meaning in which one word matches a Korean form, and the other is also found in Ryukyuan and Eastern Old Japanese, suggesting that the former is an early loan from Korean. He suggests that to eliminate such early loans, Old Japanese morphemes should not be assigned a Japonic origin unless they are also attested in Southern Ryukyuan or Eastern Old Japanese. That procedure leaves fewer than a dozen possible cognates, which may have been borrowed by Korean from Peninsular Japonic.

Addressing Vovin's criticism and following his suggested procedure, Whitman (2012) tries to isolate potential cognates substantially more rigorously than in older literature, including his own works, affirming a relationship between Japonic and Korean, but he stresses that it is relatively distant.


Typology
Most Japonic languages have voicing opposition for , with exceptions such as the Miyako dialect of Ōgami. consonants are common in North Ryukyuan languages but are rarer in South Ryukyuan. Proto-Japonic had only voiceless obstruents, like and proto-. Japonic languages also resemble Ainu and modern Korean in having a single phoneme. A five-vowel system like Standard Japanese , , , and is common, but some Ryukyuan languages also have central vowels and , and Yonaguni has only , , and .

In most Japonic languages, is based on a subsyllabic unit, the mora. Each syllable has a basic mora of the form (C)V but a nasal coda, , or counts as an additional mora. However, some dialects in northern Honshu or southern Kyushu have syllable-based rhythm.

Like Ainu, , and some modern , most Japonic varieties have a lexical , which governs whether the moras of a word are pronounced high or low, but it follows widely-different patterns. In Tokyo-type systems, the basic pitch of a word is high, with an accent (if present) marking the position of a drop to low pitch. In Kyushu dialects, the basic pitch is low, with accented syllables given high pitch. In Kyoto-type systems, both types are used.

Japonic languages, again like Ainu and Korean, are (or ), with a basic subject–object–verb word order, modifiers before nouns, and . There is a clear distinction between verbs, which have extensive morphology, and nominals, with suffixing morphology. Ryukyuan languages inflect all adjectives in the same way as verbs, while mainland varieties have classes of adjectives that inflect as nouns and verbs respectively.

Most Japonic languages mark singular and plural number, but some Northern Ryukyuan languages also have the dual. Most Ryukyuan languages mark a distinction in plural (or dual) first-person pronouns, but no Mainland varieties do so. The most common type of morphosyntactic alignment is nominative–accusative, but neutral (or direct), active–stative and (very rarely) tripartite alignment are found in some Japonic languages.


Proto-Japonic
The of the family has been reconstructed by using a combination of internal reconstruction from Old Japanese and by applying the comparative method to Old Japanese (including eastern dialects) and Ryukyuan. The major reconstructions of the 20th century were produced by Samuel Elmo Martin and Shirō Hattori.

Proto-Japonic words are generally polysyllabic, with syllables having the form (C)V. The following proto-Japonic consonant inventory is generally agreed upon, except that some scholars argue for voiced stops and instead of glides and :

+ Proto-Japonic consonants
The Old Japanese voiced consonants b, d, z and g, which never occurred word-initially, are derived from clusters of nasals and voiceless consonants after the loss of an intervening vowel.

Most authors accept six Proto-Japonic vowels:

+ Proto-Japonic vowels
Some authors also propose a high central vowel . The mid vowels and were raised to Old Japanese i and u respectively, except word-finally. Other Old Japanese vowels arose from sequences of Proto-Japonic vowels.

It is generally accepted that a lexical should be reconstructed for Proto-Japonic, but its precise form is controversial.


Notes

Works cited

Further reading

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time